Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

“By returning he re-initiated the confrontation and forfeited any claim of self defense.”

A man has the right to confront someone who has invaded his house. Doesn’t mean lethal force at first, but it does allow confrontation. You make it sound as if the intruder has the right not to be confronted.

Jeez, what is this, England?? I mean what’s next, harming the intruder is against his rights?? That’s the way it is in England.


107 posted on 04/02/2017 5:49:29 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

Not at all. He did confront him. Then he left and was not obstructed from leaving in any way. Once that occurred the potential for threat was gone. He then knew there was an intruder, knew he was clear of the threat and chose to go back and become the instigator of a new confrontation. He lost all claim to self defense.

You try that here in CO and depend on the “Make My Day Law” and I’ll write you in Florence.


109 posted on 04/02/2017 6:38:31 PM PDT by TigersEye (President Trump is not a politician.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson