Replies

The Republicans are so inept when it comes to fighting propaganda. The “Russia interfered with our democracy” bit is a prime example. They just allow them to continue to get away with this line over and over.

Every time I talk with a liberal who starts regurgitating this line I simply say, “Exactly how did Russia interfere? By exposing the corruption in the Democratic party? Don’t you think that the people have the right to know these things prior to an election? We don’t know who exposed the corruption, but whoever it was did the country a service” That shuts them up every time, because they cannot argue that the people do not have a right to know. If we followed this line of questioning every time one of the bozos make this outlandish statement about Russia “attacking” our democracy, we should simply ask this question before continuing. Over and over again.

I told my husband last night that the Republicans need someone like me just to teach them how to deal with this crap.

Yes, the charge is just so bizarre. Do they even think about what they’re saying?

HOW did the Russians tamper/mess/change/affect/effect the 2016 elections? Come on democrats and media, explain just what they did?

They can’t, and even if they try, it doesn’t amount to one single vote changing.

Another question for them:

If the Hillary campaign shows a TV ad that makes Trump look bad, is THAT tampering with the election?

If the roles are reversed?

If Hillary’s campaign accounts contain money from foreigners?

If a political action committee is run by a foreigner (Hint: Soros) and buys airtime to attack a candidate or promote a candidate? Is THAT interfering with an election?

If the President of the United States sends his political campaigners to Israel to work for Bibi Netanyahu’s opposition? Is THAT tampering with an election?

SO MANY questions! And the answer to all—except for the last—NO.

There is still a good case to be made that the Trump loves Putin op is little more than a good defense for the dems. They always play offense unless they can play the race card. That's harder to play now that Barky is out of official office and down the street playing Capt.of the brown-shirts or hiding in the islands until the smoke clears.

The case of course goes a lot like this:

THe Podesta brothers have lots of jeopardy since they sucked away millions from pootie trying their best to get rid of US sanctions put on mother Russia.This is tough to defend when you are Hillary's campaign manager and you forget to registers as a foreign agent.

Then there is the Uranium deal bubba and the hildabeast did with pootie giving away a substantial part of our uranium to mother Russia through the foundation for a few ounces of gold.

And of course Barky may have the most to lose since he may well be an FSB plant if you read Rense. Even if you don't you can hear him in his own words asking for Vlad to give him a little more time since he will "have more flexibility after the 2012 elections."

And of course one of the bigger players in the US from mother Russia is the Russian ambassador who barky met with just a few times. Was it 4 or 5? No was it 7 or 8 well... no. Oh well, seems it was 22 times zero met with the big guy from Russia at the oval office who knows about other more secretive meets.

So the regime has their share of jeopardy with the Ruskies which has to play into their op of 'Trump just can't stay away from his buddy Vlad.'