Meadows is a liar. They stated they supported replacement last week in their meetings with Trump. Now they're claiming they always supported repeal only, but now they're backing off and support replacement--for the second time.
That said, it is a functionally retarded position to ask for full repeal despite that putting millions of people out of their insurance. You do not defund or totally destroy a new entitlement in a farking day and just say, "muh conservative principles" as people go into serious economic hardship as a result.
You have no evidence of that. Disinformation being spread to tarnish the FC. Serious economic hardship? That’s what Obamacare put people into. Those who are poor have Medicaid. You can phase the Obamacare subsidies out over a year or so if needed, but without all the superfluous mandates, insurance will get cheaper again.
Where is Meadows claiming that they always supported repeal only, up until now?
If you think that it says that in this article, then you are a dumbass.