That's not "one more thing". It's not a new idea. You are introducing here nothing "new".
But this is where the not need be proven (simply declared to be) insinuation & innuendo comes in. It's worse than having previous convictions brought up (and mention of those most usually can be tossed out due to how they can unduly influence a jury towards guilt for yet some other criminal act).
What is still needed, no matter how you try to avoid it, is evidence there was conspiracy. You've addressed that only by saying (after I had told you "show me where there is conspiracy" or STFU) as I understood you (when you wouldn't STFU) that you'd intimidate and threaten your way to convincing select "roll-over" defendants to testify not to TRUTH, but what you wanted and needed them to say in order to convict some limited number of the accused, INSTEAD.
That type of activity is contrary to what is stipulated by the Constitution of the State of Texas.
In Texas, the Courts and officers of the Court (including prosecuting attorneys) are tasked not to present winning arguments to achieve convictions, or acquittal, but primarily to be finders of truth.
Once truth can be established, then judgement according to law can take place (hopefully) neutrally.
In regards to the pending trials in McClennan County, I have presented no novel legal theories on this thread, despite the putrid mocking you'd given previously in reply. Yet you have just now confessed your own willingness to bend law and legal procedure past breaking point by introducing falsehoods into court upon which convictions sought by prosecution would ultimately rely.
That's been done in Waco before. Here ya' go (were the prosecutors friends of yours?);
By TOMMY WITHERSPOON
Richard Bryan Kussmaul’s three co-defendants testified Wednesday that they gave false confessions at Kussmaul’s capital murder trial 22 years ago because they were coerced by a deputy who threatened them with the death penalty and promises of probation.Kussmaul is serving a life prison term in the 1992 shooting deaths of Leslie Murphy, 17, and Stephen Neighbors, 14, in a mobile home near Moody.
James Edward Long, Michael Dewayne Shelton and James Wayne Pitts Jr. testified at Kussmaul’s 1994 trial in Waco that all four of them raped the girl before Kussmaul shot both victims in the back with a high-powered rifle.
Long, Shelton and Pitts recanted their confessions soon after they were sentenced to 20 years in prison for sexually assaulting the girl.
Long and Pitts both served their full 20-year terms, while Shelton served 17 years before his release. All three testified Wednesday at a hearing ordered by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on the four defendants’ claims that they are innocent of the crime and that DNA evidence excludes all four in the sexual assault.
[snip] Retired State District Judge George Allen, who presided over Kussmaul’s trial in 1994, ruled at a hearing two years ago that if modern DNA testing had been available in 1992, it is “reasonably probable” that Kussmaul and the three co-defendants would not have been convicted. That ruling was affirmed in May 2015 by Waco’s 10th Court of Appeals.
After an appeal by the McLennan County District Attorney’s Office, the Court of Criminal Appeals ordered the trial court to conduct additional hearings in the case, which will continue Thursday.
Attorney Scott Brister, a former justice on the Supreme Court of Texas, is representing Shelton.
“Nothing that happens here today can change what the DNA says, and it says this woman was sexually assaulted and it wasn’t any of these four people,” Brister told the judge. “There is no way the three men who testified committed the sexual assault because the DNA belongs to somebody else.”
Long, Shelton and Pitts told similar stories Wednesday. All charged that former McLennan County Sheriff’s Detective Roy Davis threatened them with the death penalty and coerced them into signing 15-page confessions that he wrote. They charged he tailored their stories to match the evidence and that later, former prosecutor Mike Freeman, who is now a McLennan County court-at-law judge, got them together so their stories would be consistent during their trial testimony against Kussmaul.
(IT GETS WORSE read more at above link)
Well tell me more,
tell me more,
tell me more
I mean was he a heavy doper
or was he just a loser?
He was a friend of yours.
Convicted murderer Richard Bryan Kussmaul and the three co-defendants who testified against him 22 years ago are “actually innocent,” and Kussmaul should be freed from prison, a retired state district judge ruled Friday.Judge George Allen, who presided over Kussmaul’s 1994 capital murder trial, recommended that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals grant applications for writs of habeas corpus for Kussmaul, James Edward Long, Michael Dewayne Shelton and James Wayne Pitts Jr. [end excerpt]
I’m over replying to your jailbird lawyer BS. It’s not just that you do not understand the law, it’s that you want to ensure no one else does either.
I kept wondering.... why all this pseudo-legal BS from you.... PS, you are correct, you have not presented any new legal theories... you have also not presented any valid legal theories at all.
This is all nothing more than jailbird lawyer stuff. We would hear it all the time in law school internships. The perps would tell us about their great legal theories that were going to keep them out of jail, get them new trials, get their charges dismissed, put the LEOs and DA/SA in jail..... and then when the cell door slammed on them... again... they would all claim they were railroaded... victims of discrimination, etc.
The internet just allows this BS to spread wider and farther.
I think I have finally figured it out. You are working so hard to prevent the evidence from being presented in court, and trying to project all sorts of malfeasance on the DA, as opposed the gang of scum murders and drug dealers... are you, or someone you care about, are you one of the defendants?
If not a current def, perhaps you did some previous jail time?
BTW, as per your link... of course there are recantations. Some people are railroaded, especially in some rural counties where the crime so offends the populace, they want “blood” and if some marginally guilty parties get convicted, TS.
It’s not nice, but it’s reality.
The reality is the quoted case has no legal significance in this matter, but plenty of practical bearing on the instant matter.
The perseverance of LEO’s in McClennon County is not lost on the lawyers for both sides. It is one more reason for those marginally guilty parties to cut a deal early, testify against the Tier 1 defs and get out from under the steamroller.
PS, just to be sure of the issues in the matter, I called a retired Def lawyer in Waco, the older brother of one of my classmates. He is very aware of the issues, and says, at a minimum 4 to 12 of the perps will draw at least 20-Life, at least a dozen others 3-5, and many others settle for 180 in County.... and he is A DEFENSE lawyer!
Don’t mess with Texas.
PS, No further replies to your BS.... It’s like teaching a pig to dance....