Posted on 03/30/2017 6:23:33 AM PDT by Kaslin
Having lived in three of the nation’s most dangerous cities – Detroit, Baltimore and a short stint in Chicago – I’ve seen the remains of some once-great American metropolises. Outside of pockets (the north side of Chicago, Baltimore’s Inner Harbor, the small, surging sections of downtown Detroit among them), their better days were behind them by the time I came along. But I could see the shells of what once was.
Still, seeing the aftermath and living through the decline are two entirely different experiences. Until a time machine is invented, I never will fully know more than the second-hand stories echoing from the shells of these lost cities.
Hope springs eternal, though much slower as time passes. I’ve seen some rebirths in the midst of decline. But with each new story of a horrific crime or crazed city government initiative, a root is ripped from the future.
As I said, I’ve only seen these cities after they had passed their prime. My time wandering the hull of Michigan Central Station in Detroit in the middle of the night with friends never will replace the firsthand knowledge of living the spectrum from its glory days till now.
That’s why I was both saddened and grateful for an email I got this week from a listener to my radio show. The decline in my lifetime is nothing compared to what a man named Sandon Cohen has lived through in Baltimore.
Mr. Cohen has lived his whole life in Baltimore, as did his parents. But he can’t anymore; he just can’t.
It’s not so much that he changed. His city did. The attitudes, the economy, the government now all make his hometown unrecognizable from the way it was for most of his life.
The Baltimore City Council recently passed a resolution reaffirming its status as a “welcoming” city, which is code for being a sanctuary city. The new mayor mercifully vetoed an attempt to raise the city’s minimum wage to $15 an hour in spite of the struggling city economy and devastating unemployment rate. It’s suicide through politics.
Cohen has seen it all, lived it all. And he can’t be a part of it anymore.
When I read his email I quickly responded to ask if I could reprint it here, saying the testimony of someone who lived something always will be more powerful than someone else reciting statistics and second-hand stories. He graciously agreed.
The following three paragraphs were written by Cohen, a life-long Baltimore resident, but they could’ve been written about any major city under decades-long progressive Democrat control.
I have always resided in Baltimore City. So did my parents. My grandparents also lived in the city for most or all of their lives. I worked downtown for nearly thirty years. After my parents died six years ago, I moved back into the house which they had acquired in 1959, shortly before I was born, in the Arlington or Glen area of the city. While I would have preferred to live in this beloved home for so long as my health permits, I can no longer avoid the conclusion that my wellbeing requires that I move away. The causes are frequently topics of your programs.On the afternoon of January 12, in broad daylight, three young men attempted to carjack me in front of my house. They struck me, knocked me down, and managed to take my car keys. They seemed shocked when I resisted and denounced them and fled without my vehicle when my screams attracted the attention of a neighbor. The police who responded were sympathetic and professional but ultimately of little assistance. They admitted to being overwhelmed due to the increasing levels of crime and the decreasing size of the police force. Due to this occurrence and the reports of many similar incidents throughout the city, I have since felt fear every time I have had to leave the house or travel in or near the city and spend as much time as possible indoors.
Your station reported a few days ago – to my horror – that Mr. Young, the president of the City Council, has proposed that funds be taken from the police department to reduce the deficit in the school budget. I have heard no proposals from the members of the Council that would result in the hiring of additional police or otherwise deal realistically with the level of crime and other problems that have beset the city. Instead, they spout collectivist ideology that experience has long discredited, placing burdens such as an unjust minimum wage upon such producers of goods, services, and employment as remain in the city, while inviting unskilled workers from overseas to compete with those who were born in the city to compete for the shrinking number of jobs that will remain available to them. How can “progress,” however defined, be achieved in an environment where no one is safe from crime and in which more people will be driven to crime by the lack of opportunities for entry level workers and by the contemptible philosophy of certain members of the Council that those who find themselves in need are somehow the victims of those who do not? Where do the members of the Council expect to obtain funds necessary to provide public education and other legitimate government services for those who remain after law abiding taxpayers such as me leave, as hundreds of thousands have left over the last fifty years?
Someday, hopefully, residents of these cities will wake from the coma induced by grand, undelivered promises and realize new politicians implementing the same failed policies is not “change,” nor a “new direction.” It undoubtedly will be too late for some, but it doesn’t have to be too late for them all.
I noticed similar things when I was living in the Detroit area.
I got sent down South on business for a few months. Was struck by the fact that in the former home of the Confederacy, Slavery and Jim Crow, black people were far more willing to smile and strike up a conversation with me.
When I got back to Michigan we were checking each other out for weapons again.
Yes, and has been for a half-century.
Paraphrasing a WSJ article I read a few years ago:’
“In 1950, one-third of all the manufacturing capacity on the face of the earth was in the states that were on the Great Lakes - Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, etc.
Thirty years later they were calling it the Rust Belt.”
In a famous 2002 article in the Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, Harvard scholars Edward Glaeser and Andrei Shleifer named the so-called “Curley Effect” after its prototype, James Michael Curley, who served four (non-consecutive) terms as mayor of Boston between 1914 and 1950. This phenomenon, the authors explain, is the strategy of “increasing the relative size of one’s political base through distortionary, wealth-reducing policies.” Forbes magazine puts it this way: “A politician or a political party can achieve long-term dominance by tipping the balance of votes in their direction through the implementation of policies that strangle and stifle economic growth. Counterintuitively, making a city poorer leads to political success for the engineers of that impoverishment.”
I spent two weeks with my oldest brother and his wife in St Louis in 1964 or 1965. It was very nice and we had a lot of fun ‘seeing the sights”.
The way to do it is “pays more in taxes than receives in benefits and has done so for at least five years”
I presume you’re referring to St. Louis, MO, not East St. Louis, IL.
I said St. Louis so no presumption is necessary.
Nothing will change until they’re forced to file for bankruptcy.
The city as a whole is rising. Areas formerly deserted and unsafe are now renovated, re populated, and enjoyed by families with small children playing. University Circle is thriving as a unique landmark to the generosity of private citizens from the glory days of a century ago to the present day.
The downtown, deserted as late as the 80's and 90's is bursting with redevelopment and waiting lists for upscale apartments being produced as fast as the construction industry can make them.
The cost of living remains among the lowest of cities of similar or greater size.
Yes, and has been for a half-century.
LBJ’s Great Society did wonders./s
I recently talked with an elderly gentleman who worked in Cleveland for a steel company after WWII. That one corporation alone ran a fleet of over 60 freighters on the Great Lakes, and that was only a subsidiary of the main business.
Friends (actually the wife was a friend & her husband a foaming at the mouth liberal idiot) visited with me a time or two here in the South from their home on Staten Island.
She made the observation that back home, the different ethnicities had their own employment niche, meaning the same sort of job like waiter or behind-counter retail, and not a whole lot of variance between job strata.
Down here, you’re going to run into a mix of races on staff no matter where you go. Tho we do have, for instance, Middle Easterners running the local tobacco shop & Central/South Americans at field work & creeping into construction. I especially hate that because construction used to be a way for an un-degreed but hard working American to earn a decent living.
The cliche I often hear is that the Democrat party is for the poor, and the Republican party is for the rich.
My answer to that has always been that if this is true, and if it also true that the party with the most votes wins an election, then the Democrat party has a vested interest in creating more poor people, where as the Republican party has a vested interest in creating more rich people.
I had never heard of the Curley Effect, but it seems to mirror my line of reasoning. It’s nice to have a reference to fall back on.
I would modify this to allowing the vote to those who put into the system, more than what they take out of the system.
IE, net producers can vote, net consumers cannot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.