Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Thanks for your analysis.

Still, I’d like to test your assumption that the “purists” acted in “good faith” when they rejected Ryancare because they HONESTLY believed that a “better” bill was possible.

The test is simple.

The “purists” merely need to write the “better” bill that they claim to want AND get that “better bill” passed by Congress.

That’s it! A simple “Put up or shut up!”

If the “purists” DO deliver that “better” bill to the White House, that delivery will prove that the GOP “purists” acted in good faith and truly are patriots.

But, if they DON’T deliver that “better” bill, then the “purists” will have revealed something else....

BTW, rumor has it that the “Freedom Caucus” is planning to block construction of the border wall because -— wait for it — that wall is “...not high enough?”.


39 posted on 03/28/2017 6:29:25 AM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pfony1
Thanks, but I can not take the credit, I only posted the article but did not write it.

Even if the wall is 100 feet high it won't probably not be high enough for the Freedom Caucus, and with out rolled barbed wires on top, the wall wouldn't help anyway. Also on a fence there should be rolled barb wires from the bottom to the top and along the top.

58 posted on 03/28/2017 9:04:50 AM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson