Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Activists Worry That Social Media Vetting of Visa Applicants Could Quietly Expand Trump’s Muslim Ban
Intercept, the ^ | 23 March 2017 | Alex Emmons

Posted on 03/27/2017 10:21:50 AM PDT by Lorianne

Human rights activists are expressing concern that a new State Department directive requiring consular officials to look through social media accounts of some visa applicants will effectively expand President Trump’s Muslim ban — and be used to exclude people with certain political viewpoints.

On Thursday, Reuters reported that even as some key parts of Trump’s Muslim ban executive order are being held up by legal challenges, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has ordered “mandatory social media checks” on visa applicants who have ever spent time in territory controlled by ISIS. He also directed embassies and diplomatic missions to identify other “populations warranting increased scrutiny,” whose visas would receive increased scrutiny.

Amnesty International sent a letter to the State Department, requesting that the memoranda and instructions related to the new measures be made public. “These implementation memos should be disclosed because they are a matter of public concern,” the letter reads. “Thousands of people apply for visas to travel to the United States — for urgently needed medical care, to escape persecution, to reunite with their families.”

(Excerpt) Read more at theintercept.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS:
Huh? This just makes sense to do.

And also, people who are not citizens of the USA are .. well, how to put this? .... NOT CITIZENS.

So they don't get the same privacy rights that citizens do (if we have any).

1 posted on 03/27/2017 10:21:50 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Activists Worry That Facts About Militant Muslims Could Affect Approval Of Visa Applications
2 posted on 03/27/2017 10:35:26 AM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best long term prep for conservatives: Have big families & out-breed the illegals & muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Do it.


3 posted on 03/27/2017 10:40:27 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Islam mandates warfare against unbelievers and is absolutely incompatible with Western society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I guess sharing beheading videos with your facebook and twitter peeps might muck things up a bit, eh?


4 posted on 03/27/2017 10:42:51 AM PDT by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Should have titled that ‘Muslim activists worry”


5 posted on 03/27/2017 10:44:55 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

TOUGH JIT


6 posted on 03/27/2017 10:53:58 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“...Could Quietly Expand Trump’s Muslim Ban”

IT’S NOT A MUSLIM BAN!!!!!!!


7 posted on 03/27/2017 10:55:10 AM PDT by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

We would have found out that the San Bernadino shooter was a Jihadi. We wouldn’t have let the Tsarneav brothers in to bomb Boston.

BOTH had jihadi crap on their facebook pages.


8 posted on 03/27/2017 11:07:44 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
There is NO ban on Muslims. There is a ban on countries that produce terrorists....IF those people happen to be Muslims from one of those countries, so be it!


9 posted on 03/27/2017 11:25:53 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Because all people enjoy the “human right” to ram their autos into random strangers while chanting religious slogans.


10 posted on 03/27/2017 11:35:19 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Amnesty International sent a letter to the State Department, requesting that the memoranda and instructions related to the new measures be made public. “These implementation memos should be disclosed because they are a matter of public concern

IOW, tell the world how to sanitize their social media accounts. Amnesty can pound sand.

11 posted on 03/27/2017 11:54:55 AM PDT by Ford4000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Face it: “activists”, the media, the courts and Demonrats have a veto power on anything Trump does, especially doing anything to limit the flow of illegal alien criminals into this country.


12 posted on 03/27/2017 12:02:42 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Trump won; I celebrated; I'm good. Let's get on with the civil war now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“Activist,” which I am certain has a noble ring to it in the author’s ears, now means the same as “anti-American,” “traitor,” and “useful idiot.”


13 posted on 03/27/2017 12:23:03 PM PDT by Gen.Blather (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

That would be racist! Imagine banning innocent people from coming to our country just because they cheer when terrorists murder the innocent. That is un-American, isn’t it?


14 posted on 03/27/2017 1:26:09 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson