Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sargon
That may be in some areas but we certainly did not see it when the administration supported Rino care, did we?


12 posted on 03/27/2017 12:14:07 AM PDT by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

Are there any actual, philosophical Republicans involved—or is it all, like Kusnher, Cohn, Ivanka, and the CEOs, liberal Democrats?


13 posted on 03/27/2017 12:19:12 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
There you go again.

This administration ultimately walked away from "Rinocare". The President could have dragged the process on, but he did just the opposite.

What the President did do was to supported a creative process wherein an inadequate bill was debated and changed, and which ultimately failed to be even voted on, due to no fault of his own.

The Presidents only mistake was in giving the Paul Ryan the benefit of the doubt—presuming that this GOPe titan would competently fulfill the responsibilities of his job as Speaker of the House regarding repealing & replacing Obamacare.

The original point I was responding to was your flippant implication regarding the President's desire to reduce government. The fact that such a goal might not be the focus of this "SWAT team"—or of the recent healthcare vote—does not in any way mean that he's not trying to reduce government in many tangible ways—probably moreso than any president in the last half century.

21 posted on 03/27/2017 12:32:43 AM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson