Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/26/2017 6:53:14 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: sukhoi-30mki

wow!

4600 mph and heavy enough to sink a ship, too?

amazing!


35 posted on 03/26/2017 7:35:20 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
First rule of reporting new Russian weapons:

They are magical and beyond the US’s abilities to defend.

41 posted on 03/26/2017 7:42:09 PM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
A radar/computer-guided controlled-burst from an "ATHENA"-type laser would demolish any of them over ten miles down-range (and closing fast!) in a picosecond. Maybe two.

Knirps for moisture.

48 posted on 03/26/2017 8:12:33 PM PDT by Gargantua ("Still not tired of winning---beeyotch!" ;^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Looks a lot like the Boeing X-51 waverider.


51 posted on 03/26/2017 8:18:44 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Big, Big problem if they have a working version. This one in the picture is almost a 100% copy of one I was associated with. It is a U.S. company. The engine is the challenge. The Russians have been very interested in hypersonics for 20+ years. A working version virtually makes capital ships obsolete. For a properly designed version, there is only one method to stop it. For the Russian version I saw, there are two methods, but the additional one would be a challenge to deploy properly. Bottom line: I don’t think they have a working version yet. I have not seen any incremental successes for the engine they have.


52 posted on 03/26/2017 8:20:42 PM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

By the way: the 3M22 Zircon pictured in the comments is the U.S. version. Just look at the patches on the engine.


53 posted on 03/26/2017 8:23:32 PM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I suspect that we are way ahead of the Russians on this subject.


56 posted on 03/26/2017 8:39:20 PM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Just wait until muzzies take over one of our European allies that has nuclear weapons. It’s only a matter of time.


57 posted on 03/26/2017 9:00:52 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Once the launch foilies fall alway, time to deploy countermeasures against the zircon encrusted tweezers.


65 posted on 03/26/2017 9:57:17 PM PDT by printhead (I need a new tagline. Happy days are here again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We have airborne lasers..


67 posted on 03/27/2017 12:27:17 AM PDT by Davy Crocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Disturbing. Mach 7 is almost 1.5 miles per second. Hopefully Airborne Early Warning aircraft would detect these. Otherwise, air defense ships would detect them 25 to 30 miles out. Thats 11 to 15 seconds to detect and destroy them.
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/focus-analysis/naval-technology/3810-analysis-3k22-and-3m22-zircon-the-next-generation-hypersonic-missile-of-the-russian-navy.html


68 posted on 03/27/2017 12:55:38 AM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I remember reading that Khrushchev told Kennedy that they were churning out hydrogen tipped ICBM’s like sausages. They didn’t have one operational per a satellite photo.


69 posted on 03/27/2017 1:01:31 AM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It would hardly need a warhead at those speeds. Simply put a tungsten nose-cone on it. The kinetic energy alone would do the job.

Not sure about the aerodynamics at low altitudes. I would think anything flying at high-Mach would be coming in from high-altitude.


70 posted on 03/27/2017 3:04:11 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The U.K. will be right on it as soon as they address their muzlim issue. Right away, no worries...and there are a lot of real men left there to help out.


72 posted on 03/27/2017 3:19:07 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Drain the swamp. Build the wall. Open the Pizzagate. I refuse to inhabit any safe space.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

There is a line in a James Bond movie where the villains says something like “ 007 what you doing here? I don’t care about your pathetic little island.” I don’t the Russians are focusing on the royal Navy.


81 posted on 03/27/2017 6:08:36 AM PDT by stellaluna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I have never been one to pooh-pooh Russian aerospace, but given the dismal results in US efforts on hypersonics I have to take this with a VERY large grain of salt.

It may be proposed, may be in development, but I would lay odds against operational capability.

84 posted on 03/27/2017 6:21:42 AM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Cool missile!


89 posted on 03/27/2017 7:25:26 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Love your neighbor as you love yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

4600 mph is about the velocity of a Rail Gun.


91 posted on 03/27/2017 11:41:51 AM PDT by BuffaloJack ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson