“I know from having spent seven years as a U.S. attorney that the FISA court and the way that works and foreign intelligence surveillance activities - it is very, very difficult to get that type of activity going,” he said. “You have to go and convince an independent judge.”
“So I don’t see any evidence of that at this point in time. We’ll continue to listen, but I can tell you from my experience that kind of stuff is very difficult to get.”
Christy is looking at it from the view of an honest lawyer.
If you do not have a warrant and probable cause, the judge will throw your evidence out of court.
So Christy is thinking like a prosecutor preparing for court.
Where he is off course is that obummer has no regard for the law, for the Constitution nor for simple plain ethics.
He had no intention of trying a case, only to find ways to stab Trump in the back, only something to smear him with.
Do not forget that this is only one instance in which obummer has violated the law.
Christy is looking at this from the angle of what he would do. He is not looking at it from the view of a criminal.
So that tells me, like I felt when I first read the article, that Christy wouldn’t look at something like a criminal would look at things, like libs, and the Clintons, Podestas, Bidens, etc...
I felt that was the way Christy was looking at this, from an honest look...
I agree. There seems to be a lot of nasty comments about Chris here but I think he is a friend of President Trumps and is simply giving an honest answer based on his experience as a trustworthy lawyer, not an obama criminal