You agreed with me that Trump's executive order to the IRS not to enforce mandate was right, as to return to some semblance of Constitutional governance. If in the new law there's found something just as agregious, would it not be right also for Trump to use his pen?
Do I like it? No. But these are desperate times, and desperate times call for desperate measures.
“Agregious” (egregious) is not the standard for valid federal law. The Constitution is the standard. To the extent you are willing to violate the Constitution because you think a law is egregious, to that extent you promote tyranny.