To: libstripper; 1Old Pro
Reasonable people can come to no other conclusion that it was TRUMP who was under surveillance. Once THE RUSSIANS are eliminated as a target, nothing else makes sense other than TRUMP was the target. ILLEGALLY!
41 posted on
03/22/2017 11:12:34 AM PDT by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: libstripper; 1Old Pro
A couple of other things. If Hillary had been elected, and Trump had voiced concerns about being under surveillance, the media would have laughed, jeered, and slapped their thunder thighs in glee about what a loser he was. And of course, there would have been little chance that he would have gotten confirming data. And even if he did, they would have said it was fake.
But now, Nunes has said that the information was brought to him by someone who thought he should have it. Now will the media and the rodents start screaming to prosecute the leakers? LOL!!!!
Oh yes, and Rush is now saying that the media is beside itself. HAHAHA YA THINK???
51 posted on
03/22/2017 11:28:02 AM PDT by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: libstripper; 1Old Pro
In my posting, I missed something that it is important. Nunes believes that the monitoring was done legally! I still can’t come up with a scenario of how or why someone might be monitoring Trump and his staff, legally!
120 posted on
03/22/2017 12:50:49 PM PDT by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson