Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: simpson96

When these kinds of things aren’t thinly disguised bribes, they are thinly disguised money laundering.

If the Clintons still had power, I would suggest the former. If they didn’t, I would suggest the latter.


4 posted on 03/20/2017 6:46:29 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marron
Gotta keep Hillary on life support until 2020.

Democrats are praying for some devine intervention so we can somehow have a nationwide election in 2018.

6 posted on 03/20/2017 6:48:41 PM PDT by Newbomb Turk (Hey Newbomb, where's your brothers ElCamino ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: marron
Last line of the article:

"Here’s to Mrs. Clinton taking advantage of her namesake. It would almost be unnatural for her not to."

7 posted on 03/20/2017 6:49:36 PM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: marron
When these kinds of things aren’t thinly disguised bribes, they are thinly disguised money laundering.

It's a bet and an investment in what they hope will be a resurgence of the democrat party.

Chelsea is sort of the "Rosemary's Baby" of the democrat party - the spawn of their real King and Queen.

She belongs to the party as Rosemary's Baby belonged to all the worshippers of Satan.

She won't actually have to do anything more than carry the Clinton name into the next generation.


33 posted on 03/20/2017 7:51:32 PM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best long term prep for conservatives: have big families & outproduce muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson