Roberts was, along with Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court (FISA), members of Congress, and Donald Trump targeted by “HAMMER.”
Posted on 03/19/2017 6:23:42 PM PDT by drewh
Whistleblower Tapes: Trump Wiretapped By ‘The Hammer,’ Brennan’s and Clapper’s Secret Computer System By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones
President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper and his Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director John Brennan oversaw a secret supercomputer system known as “THE HAMMER,” according to former NSA/CIA contractor-turned whistleblower Dennis Montgomery.
Clapper and Brennan were using the supercomputer system to conduct illegal and unconstitutional government data harvesting and wiretapping. THE HAMMER was installed on federal property in Fort Washington, Maryland at a complex which some speculate is a secret CIA and NSA operation operating at a US Naval facility.
President Trump’s allegation that the Obama Administration was wiretapping him is not only supported by Montgomery’s whistleblower revelations about Brennan’s and Clapper’s computer system THE HAMMER, but also by statements made this week by William Binney, a former NSA Technical Director of the World Geopolitical and Military Analysis Reporting Group, by former CIA and State Department official Larry Johnson, and by Montgomery’s attorney Larry Klayman.
Computer expert Dennis Montgomery developed software programs that could breach secure computer systems and collect massive amounts of data.
That system, THE HAMMER, according to the audio tapes, accessed the phone calls, emails and bank accounts of millions of ordinary Americans.
The tapes also reveal that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court (FISA), Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, 156 other judges, members of Congress, and Donald J. Trump were targeted by the HAMMER. One of the audio tapes made public by Federal Judge G. Murray Snow revealed that Brennan and Clapper particularly targeted and wiretapped Donald Trump a “zillion times.”
Montgomery also contends that the government can plant files such as state secrets on a target’s computer, setting up the owner of that device for blackmail or framed prosecution.
Former CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson alleged in 2013 she was under electronic surveillance for at least two years and that three classified documents were planted on her “compromised” computer.
The audio tapes were released by Federal Judge G. Murray Snow in Maricopa County, Arizona in the Justice Department’s civil contempt case against Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio.
Attorney Klayman, founder of Freedom Watch, represented Montgomery before federal Judge Royce C. Lamberth. Klayman, who characterizes his client Montgomery as a “whistleblower,” told Fox News that Montgomery “turned over 600 million plus pages of information to the FBI.” Judge Lamberth was formerly the presiding judge over the FISA court. After Montgomery produced his documentation, the FBI gave him two immunity agreements: one in the area of “production” and the other regarding “testimony.” The FBI then took possession of Montgomery’s documentation. Attorney Klayman asserts that this information precipitated James Clapper’s resignation.
Clapper had gone before Congress to testify under oath that the NSA, and other intelligence agencies including the CIA,” were not collecting massive amounts of telephonic and Internet metadata on hundreds of millions of innocent American citizens” according to Klayman. Whistleblower Edward Snowden’s revelations proved otherwise. Clapper was subsequently found to be untruthful and resigned on November 17, 2016, effective January 20, 2017, the day Donald Trump was sworn in. Clapper has not been prosecuted for perjury.
In that case the defendant was granted a summary judgement.
“Second, without record evidence demonstrating that Montgomery’s technology actually worked, Montgomery is unable to show that there is a genuine dispute of material fact regarding the material truth of the Chapter’s assertions, and therefore cannot support the element of falsity.”
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4238906/montgomery-v-risen/
Testifying under oath both Sheriff Arapio and his chief deputy Dan Sheridan said the information from Montgomery was “junk” and of no value.
“Under questioning by the judge during contempt of court proceedings, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio admitted his office had hired Dennis Montgomery to do an unorthodox investigation. The next day, his chief deputy explained it had to do with surveillance by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Central Intelligence Agency.”
[skip]
“When Snow asked Arpaio if it was fair to say that “the informer was giving you junk,” Arpaio said, “Yes.””
Thank you. That was what I was looking for, which paints things in a different light for me. Much appreciated.
I second that opinion of Larry Klayman!
Here is a more detailed account of Montgomery.
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/nevada-companys-troubles-entangle-gibbons-federal-government
It appears he didn’t work for the government after 2004/2005. Any information on his hard drives would be from before that time.
I will temper my reply, though, and say that the context of the 2015 article from KJZZ may be irrelevant in this case, especially after reading the article still posted on Drudge.
Arapio says it was “junk” but doesn’t elaborate. While I am not willing to accept at face value the validity of Montgomery’s data, I am also not willing to accept at face value Arapio’s characterization of the data as “junk” because I don’t know the context of his statement.
A lot of things can change in two years, both from an understanding of the context of the material and the perception of it.
If Montgomery wanted to have his data pulled from that trial because it was irrelevant, it may have been because he needed to have a trump card (no pun intended) in his pocket.
Think of Whittaker Chambers, who had given the government loads of purloined copied documents that Alger Hiss had given to him, but he kept a small amount of the espionage filed to himself in the event the Democrat administration of Harry Truman turned out to be completely corrupt and untrustworthy (it did, in spades) and that turned out to be a good move on his part, since instead of going after Alger Hiss, the Truman Administration (Truman Justice) went after him instead.
Fortunately, when he spoke to Richard Nixon, who asked if he had surrendered all the materials, he said he hadn’t, and those turned out to be “The Pumpkin Papers” which eventually took Hiss down.
So I don’t discount that Montgomery was trying to get all those removed for his own protection as a whistleblower. He may be unreliable, but even criminals who are unreliable may speak the truth on occasion.
Not necessarily...in the KJZZ article, Montgomery maintains his data was "copied from the CIA" not that he obtained it while he was an employee of the CIA. (I don't think that is an insignificant distinction)
It doesn't seem impossible to me that he would either still have a backdoor in (improbable, but the CIA hasn't covered itself with glory in some aspects of IT related things) or he could have obtained it from a willing leaker (we KNOW there are those as well).
Just trying to keep an open mind on this stuff.
Scroll down to Exhibit C. An e-mail from Detective Mackiewicz.
https://www.scribd.com/document/271194289/Melendres-1166-D-Ariz-2-07-cv-02513-1166
Thanks for providing that. It is proof enough for me, even if I don’t know anything about the people on the other side of it.
There may be a reason Montgomery would provide disks full of data which I agree would be “junk”, but in the absence of an explanation, the explanation is the most obvious one.
Good job. That was exactly what I was trying to determine.
Roberts was, along with Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court (FISA), members of Congress, and Donald Trump targeted by “HAMMER.”
Don’t worry
Read this
Wow!
Mike Zullo was on with Alex Jones last night affirming that Dennis Montgomery eventually came across with the evidence and he also was granted federal whistleblower witness protection which is NOT given fraudsters. This was negotiated for him by his current (I believe) lawyer, Larry Klayman.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/u-s-gathering-dirt-on-supreme-court-justices/
If I understand correctly, the information on the 50 hard drives was originally completely unrelated to what people paid him $120K for in a legal case...but at some later date, he DID give the FBI the hard drives with the right information, for which he was granted immunity?
That appears to be the case.
There is a link to Jerome Corsi’s big new reveal on the banned site that you can link to on Drudge detailing NSA wiretapping of Arpaio’s PROSECUTION and the JUDGE and how the DOJ and prosecution were talking to each other during the trial all shown in a timeline with Covington Burling and Perkins Coie involved.
Begin at # 117 , and read to end of thread.
Thanks, Seizethecarp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.