Skip to comments.
Trump budget expected to seek historic contraction of federal workforce
WaPo ^
| Damian Paletta
Posted on 03/13/2017 6:53:22 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
To: Alberta's Child
I think a lot of people losing their jobs don’t know it yet. If 30K DC homes suddenly go on the market, I think you’d see a mass migration from suburbs everywhere by people who see their fed job as secure for at least the next 8 years. I guess it depends on how the study defines the DC ‘region’.
41
posted on
03/13/2017 8:08:12 AM PDT
by
txhurl
To: Sam Clements
Exactly! 👏
42
posted on
03/13/2017 8:11:25 AM PDT
by
CommieCutter
("Trump is god emperor and he will win." -- some hacker)
To: RoosterRedux
According to an economic analysis by Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moodys Analytics, the reductions outlined so far by Trumps advisers would reduce employment in the region by 1.8 percent and personal income by 3.5 percent, and lower home prices by 1.9 percent.That doesn't sound like massive cuts to me. Sounds like we are just scratching the surface. I would hoping on something along the lines of a 30 per cent cut across the board.
Well, I guess it's a start.
To: txhurl
I think many of the people who live in Northern Virginia moved there to get the hell out of DC.
44
posted on
03/13/2017 8:19:37 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
To: RoosterRedux
These are cuts that would require a wholesale triage of a vast array of federal activities.Some pretty sweet words right there!
45
posted on
03/13/2017 8:27:11 AM PDT
by
houeto
To: RoosterRedux
Trump = Potter. That Donald, he’s a shrewd one! Obama probably lost a million on his dump already.
To: RoosterRedux
To: RoosterRedux
Less than a 2% reduction in income and house prices in DC, and liberals will be whining
48
posted on
03/13/2017 9:01:08 AM PDT
by
CottonBall
(Thank you, Julian)
To: Alberta's Child
49
posted on
03/13/2017 9:04:34 AM PDT
by
CottonBall
(Thank you, Julian)
To: Cobra64
We’ve all seen the debt clock going faster and faster.
Maybe a new slogan to go along with “drain the swamp” should be “Stop the clock.”
To: RoosterRedux
If Lois Lerner is getting a dime a month that is too much.
51
posted on
03/13/2017 9:13:24 AM PDT
by
alternatives?
(Why have an army if there are no borders?)
To: RoosterRedux
The FEDERAL EMPLOEES that lose their “positions” will have absolutely zero problems quickly obtaining high paying jobs in the private sector. After all, THEIR OWN STUDIES say they are paid 34% lower than their private sector counterparts doing the same work.
So this will be good personally for these “highly skilled” federal employees. It should have been done long ago.
/sarc
52
posted on
03/13/2017 9:15:20 AM PDT
by
House Atreides
(Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
To: traderrob6; Alberta's Child
There are over 3 million people employed in the DC metro area and about 10% are federal government employees. If my math is correct that 1.8% impact in the region means the President is talking about RIF for 20% of the federal government workers in the DC region and that's a good start!
53
posted on
03/13/2017 9:16:46 AM PDT
by
relee
(Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds far away)
To: RoosterRedux
Like I care about Washington D.C.’s drop in house values by 1.9%
I care about the same they cared when my house dropped in value by 20% and around the nation by 50% or more.
I’d slash the bureaucracy in half. Trump’s being nice.
54
posted on
03/13/2017 9:27:18 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
To: relee
Maybe a later EO will also cover the parts of fed budgets that pay contractors.
Chase all the rats via 20% RIF into the private sector contractors, then cut the budget for them by 40%.
55
posted on
03/13/2017 9:28:21 AM PDT
by
txhurl
To: RoosterRedux
>>the reductions outlined so far by Trumps advisers would reduce employment in the region by 1.8 percent and personal income by 3.5 percent, and lower home prices by 1.9 percent.
I’ve been saying that one way to measure Trump’s success would be if DC-area home prices stay flat. If they actually go down, that would be a resounding success.
56
posted on
03/13/2017 9:32:26 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: txhurl
I'm hoping the President focuses on the close-in Maryland suburbs, lots of opportunity there ...
EPA, IRS, CPSC ...
57
posted on
03/13/2017 9:40:34 AM PDT
by
relee
(Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds far away)
To: RoosterRedux
58
posted on
03/13/2017 9:49:20 AM PDT
by
Menehune56
("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
To: RoosterRedux
In other words it's the Democraps and RINOs worst nightmare.
BWA HA HA HA HA!!!!
To: PGR88
7 of the 10 wealthiest counties in the USA surround Washington DC.
It clear to me - for flyover America to prosper, Washington DC must suffer.
*************
I looked up our family home from Bethesda 1963 ,,, it sold 4 years ago for $1.9m and is now valued way over $2m ... too bad we moved away in 1967 and LOST money on it ,, selling then for $35k.. The DC area has been out of control hoovering up the nations wealth for the last 40 years.
60
posted on
03/13/2017 10:15:49 AM PDT
by
Neidermeyer
(Show me a peaceful Muslim and I will show you a heretic to the Koran.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson