Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Keeping pelosicare for now might be the best alternative amongst bad choices.

Why: the costs are so high and the willingness to comply so low, it’ll likely collapse on its own soon enough. Couple that with the administration not willing to enforce the mandates and soon the only people on it will be folks with horrible illnesses.

It’ll be like the 55 mph speed limit. Rarely obeyed, universally hated.


79 posted on 03/11/2017 6:06:53 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (It's no longer Right versus left, but Americanism versus globalist scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: RKBA Democrat; P-Marlowe
Like with The Highlander, the same with ObamaCare: “There can be only one.”

OCare has been about which provider would be the last one. Folks say “let it collapse” but they forget that there will still be all those congressionally passed laws in place and there will be only one provider remaining. That is referred to as single provider.

And there will be a law on the books requiring the government to reimburse them each year. A socialist doesn't care if the provider is called “Anthem” or the Fed, since the fed will be reimbursing.

So, in my opinion we are marching toward single provider, the laws are already on the books, and everyone is encouraging it to get here faster by clamoring for collapse.

Current law won't allow the last provider to collapse.

82 posted on 03/11/2017 6:31:18 PM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson