To summarize: the defenders of the retired SWAT captain/American samurai class still ignore the fact that he shot the woman because he didn't have fire-control of his weapon.
But they're OK with that, and act like their jack-booted samurai is somehow justified, even though the local prosecutor would be throwing the book at a mere peasant for doing the EXACT SAME THING. 😀
To summarize: Time and again, you willfully ignore facts in evidence and intelligent deliberation. Similarly, your vapid insults and caricatures do not bolster your assertions.
I seriously doubt that you are capable of engaging in thoughtful discussion without tossing spears.