Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pgkdan

Your argument is really an argument that the Senate should not exist.

I’m open to the argument, but I don’t think I agree. In fact, I would like to return to the 2/3 of Senators present cloture rule, with the caveat that there would be no “announced” filibusters, that is, to keep the floor Senators would have to actually keep the floor.

The unlimited debate rule in the Senate obstructs democracy, which to me is an excellent outcome.


20 posted on 03/10/2017 6:08:41 AM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

That’s one of the arguments McConnell uses to keep from doing anything. Fine. Let’s keep the same old rules and tie our hands and keep President Trump from enacting the agenda he was elected to enact. Then when the dems retake the Senate you can be damned sure they’ll finish what Harry started and ram THEIR agenda down our throats without us having done anything meaningful while we control both houses and the WH. Typical Republican bullshit. I don’t know why it bothers me, it’s what they’ve done all my f*cking adult life. I should be used to it by now!


34 posted on 03/10/2017 6:25:45 AM PST by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble

The Senate with it’s current cast of characters probably shouldn’t exist. When you have a travesty like the “Gang of Eight”, why do you need the Senate? Eight boneheads telling the rest of them how it will be. Who needs that. Most of them are so old that they haven’t had a lucid thought in years. It’s a mess.


42 posted on 03/10/2017 6:53:50 AM PST by abbastanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson