As Levin pointed out, let's have a look at those intelligence briefings Obama was given.
And when parsed with Obama's insistence that he didn't "interfere" with investigations, he knew and could have exercised judgment, but instead let it go forward.
This could also fall under the Crimes Act of 1958.
FALSIFYING GOVT DOCUMENTS.
Keep in mind---falsifying official documents is the criminal MO to hide larger crimes.
A person falsifying documents can be held criminally liable if they are deliberately acting with the intention of deceiving or defrauding another party.
Falsifying documents is a very serious offense and is generally classified as a felony. This means that a person charged with falsifying documents may be subject to the following legal penalties:
◾Having to pay a monetary fine
◾Incarceration in a prison facility
Depending on the gravity of the offense, as well as individual state laws, falsifying documents can result in a prison sentence of 5-10 years.
Also, if official government documents or govt authorities were involved, the legal penalties may be more severe. Legal penalties may increase with repeat offenses.
Many different types of acts can be considered as falsifying a document, including:
◾Altering or misrepresenting fact-based information
◾Stating false information when requested to provide truthful statements
◾Forging a signature
◾Using official letterheads without authorization
◾Knowingly using or distributing a fake document
The penalty for falsifying government documents is outlined in the Crimes Act of 1958.
Was this part of the run up?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL4R087od9M
Judge Napolitano on AG Lynch’s secret NSA deal
wow...sounds just like back in the day during impeachment
HOLD ON ! HOLD ON ! HOLD ON !
Your link should be posted as a separate FR thread, if it’s not already.