Does it seem more reasonable to bombard him with criticism the instant he gets into office, or to wait something like ten to twelve months so that the criticism will be informed?
Progressives are not willing to give Sessions the benefit of the doubt, because they have an unrelated agenda. This agenda is not pretty, so they keep it hidden from view.
The term “benefit of the doubt” is very useful to contemplate.
Twelve months grace is too much. Sessions has had close to a month in office. Other cabinet officers have already been making waves and getting to work. By this time next month Sessions needs to be getting tangible results in public, or the month after that he should be considering a new line of work.
In past, RINOs hid their inaction with promises of future action, but they were always empty promises, since they were more interested in keeping their job than putting it to good use.
Grand sum total of time for Sessions: three months. Get to it or get out of the way.