Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
“He could have stated his response more accurately, but it was clearly not intentional. “

i.e., he didn't mean to lie.

That's what it will sound like to the Press and the Dems.

Having successfully stuffed the news cycle of the Speech. They now get another 24 hour pass to push the perjury BS.

Any halfwit community organizer knows about a thousand cuts and plays for the long term. Those cuts are stacked up now and sequenced for launch. You see there is this little house in Kalaroma...

95 posted on 03/02/2017 6:35:08 PM PST by Badboo (Why it is important)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Badboo; Jane Long
“He could have stated his response more accurately, but it was clearly not intentional. “

i.e., he didn't mean to lie.

That's what it will sound like to the Press and the Dems.

My exact point. The rest of the statement is flawless; why this big wart in the middle?

Unless it is a 3D chess trap, meant to bring Hillary Clinton's many contacts with Russians -- including selling uranium -- into a Special Prosecutors hands.

101 posted on 03/02/2017 6:38:37 PM PST by Lazamataz (The "news" networks and papers are bitter, dangerous enemies of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson