Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

I agree with just about everything you just Posted, but there is nothing in the AG’s Job Description that says he alone can pick and choose which Laws he agrees with.

Senator Sessions made a point of that during his Confirmation Hearings and when he was Sworn into Office.

Isn’t it curious that Obama and Holder ignored the Federal Law regarding Marijuana but they never tried to change it?

What was their motive, any idea?


115 posted on 03/02/2017 9:23:50 AM PST by Kickass Conservative (The way Liberals carry on about Deportation, you would think "Mexico" was Spanish for "Auschwitz".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: Kickass Conservative
I agree with just about everything you just Posted, but there is nothing in the AG’s Job Description that says he alone can pick and choose which Laws he agrees with.

So? They still pick and choose which laws they enforce. Always have, always will - until fedgov is reigned in to its proper constitutional boundaries.

Isn’t it curious that Obama and Holder ignored the Federal Law regarding Marijuana but they never tried to change it? What was their motive, any idea?

My guess - they wanted to appease their constituency, but not give up any real fedgov power. So they straddled it.

118 posted on 03/02/2017 9:34:23 AM PST by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson