26 SASC members.. all of whom are informed to themselves who has actually met with whom-— you know this hopefully. So, even the lying Claire McCaskill has been outed, and more to follow.
The purpose is to keep throwing crap against the wall to see what sticks. An act of desperation— really, Al Franken?
“The Hill” “polled” (really, they polled the security cleared committee and that poll is valid-— what a laugh). The canvas is painted and awaiting the framing. Smart people can see this, and the media is losing... again.
McCaskill is reportedly also playing the semantics game now and saying that she (and another member) never meet/met with the Ambassador alone (implying Sessions does?). Normally I’d immediately dismiss the validity of such a story originating from the Washington Post that ‘reportedly’ contacted (poll was my take) the committee and their so-called responses, but in this day of political blabbing to the press and rabid Trumphunting.
Speaking of the get-Trump movement, since Sessions was so free & forthcoming with the info of these meetings today, there is no reason not to have done so one month ago at the confirmation hearing to keep yet another avoidable, unnecessary thread from popping up as this crap is indeed having an impact on some otherwise smart, centrist people who still rely on the MSM for their info.