Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Why not? That wouldn’t touch medicare and medicaid.


3 posted on 02/26/2017 9:25:47 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fruser1

?


23 posted on 02/26/2017 9:36:02 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
Not saying Kasich isn't a complete tool but Obolacare messed with some areas that are, IMO, hard to unravel.

Self employed buddy and his wife had been with the same insurance company for over a decade. It was kind of like they had banked a bunch of premiums.

Their plan got cancelled because it wasn't ACA compliant.

First year with the new company she had a serious injury. Of course they were paying more in premiums than the old policy and they had a higher deductible.

That company withdrew and she was still having operations. At least under the ACA she was covered for a pre-existing condition.

Another year goes by and yep, that company withdrew and yep, she's still having operations. But at least with the new company she's covered for a pre-existing condition.

If coverage for pre-existing conditions goes away they're on the hook for a $35k operation (which is hopefully the last one). And given the high deductibles they're stretched pretty thin as it is.

So yanking ACA completely would just about ruin them. Yeah, they might be able to get into some special risk pool and maybe that would be a better deal but my guess is that the premiums would ruin them as well.

Of course insurance companies having to cover pre-existing conditions is one of the reasons premiums keep going through the roof for everyone but my buddy sure wasn't the cause of his original insurance company going away.

42 posted on 02/26/2017 9:57:57 AM PST by Proud_texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

What is Obamacare, some kind of legacy monument for preservation of a heritage? This is not the redstone lands of Utah, or Lake Tahoe. Total demolition is not only called for, it is ABSOLUTELY imperative the dismantling be carried out pronto.

It is better to dynamite a failing bridge, and start over with new anchor points and spans, than to try to “repair” it. The repairs may only be piecemeal, and cause further stresses and overloads at some other point in the structure.

Total fail is inevitable.


49 posted on 02/26/2017 10:16:19 AM PST by alloysteel (John Galt has chosen to take the job. This time, Atlas did NOT shrug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
Why not? That wouldn’t touch medicare and medicaid.

It would end the Medicaid expansion and return it to the levels of pre-Obamacare.

92 posted on 02/26/2017 12:32:08 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson