Here's a picture I found at the site:
Just no.
Here's a picture I found at the site:
Just no.
The CFR, Tri-lateral Commission, the Bilderburgers, contrails, Derry Brownfield, Alex Jones, Reynolds-wrap....
Rod Serling
(Do-do-do-do...do-do-do-do)
Is that an artist’s rendition, or an actual photograph?
< /sarc>
It’s hard to believe stuff you don’t see or have first hand info of. But it pays to get opinions on topics that are controversial and keep it all in the back of your mind.Some obviously presented better than others which is the nature of the internet.
Here’s a question for ya,did any of these events happen?
1. Aurora crash of 1897
https://www.google.com/maps/@-79.974864,-81.952237,2002m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en-US
2.Cape Girardeau crash 1941-
http://www.ufocasebook.com/missouricrash.html
3.Roswell crash—1947
http://www.roswellufocrash.com/
4.Aztec crash—1948
http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case879.htm
5.ufo’s fly over white house—rense-wapost
http://www.rense.com/general8/flew.htm
6.Billy Meyer
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/meier/esp_meier6g.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Meier
Photographic analysis was performed on Meier’s photographs and films in the late 1970s when Meier first started to publish his photographs. In 1978, a report titled “Preliminary Photo Analysis,” written by physicist Neil M. Davis at Design Technology in Poway, California, provided test results of an analysis of one of Meier’s controversial photographs. Using microscopic examination, density contour plots, examination for evidence of double exposure, photo paste-up, or a model at short range suspended on a string. They state “Nothing was found to indicate a hoax” and concluded, “Nothing was found in the examination of the print which could cause me to believe that the object in the photos is anything other than a large object photographed a distance from the camera.” They also pointed out that the print was a second generation photograph and that a more detailed analysis of the photo could only properly be made on the original film negative.[17]
THese are just the tip of the iceberg of what ufo info there is out there and none are recent since the volume of those recent is so large its impossible to quantify.
If even one of the above is true it should change everything we have been told over the years.
Jury is out.