"On the same page" how? Are you suggesting that the feds' violating the tenth is justified by nonuniformity of state drug policy?
Where did I say it was justified?
I didn't say you said so; I asked a question, to which your answer seems to be "no".
So does "on the same page" mean all enforcing the policy the feds want? I suppose if they did, the feds might step out of that enforcement; what would you have us conclude from this observation? (Or was it just an idle musing?)
Don’t get me started on the drug mess. I’d just as soon let anyone dumb enough to use the crap knock themselves out, do it to their heart’s content, as long as I don’t have to support their behavior. But that’s not how it works. Take alcoholism, a BEHAVIOR with bad results. The damned liberals have made it into a disease for which I have to pay in the form of increased taxes to help those “suffering” from this “disease”. If they can’t handle a drink they should not take one; if they do so with bad consequences it’s supposed to be at their own risk. When the potheads crack addicts and methheads have toked their way to unemployability, they’ll be “victims” of the next “disease (really a BEHAVIOR) and have their hand in my pocket like the alkies. Bottom line, why should I pay for their behaviors?
But policies should be consistent and well understood, fed, state and local.