Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

.
So we have another Circus court of banan-appeals?

The founders letters demonstrate that the purpose for the second amendment was to assure that the people remain militarily stronger than their government.

This decision cannot stand, even back in the 1930s the SCOTUS saw that military grade weapons were what was intended to be protected.
.


76 posted on 02/22/2017 1:40:13 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
This decision cannot stand, even back in the 1930s the SCOTUS saw that military grade weapons were what was intended to be protected.

That's right and if SCOTUS were to uphold this decision there would be two opposing SCOTUS decisions. One claiming that only military weapons are covered by the 2nd Amendment and the other saying that no military weapons are covered by the 2nd Amendment.

In that case all laws regarding weapons of any kind would be null and void. The law would be an outlaw, a violation of the principle purpose of the law. Time to hoist the black flag and draw cutlasses.

79 posted on 02/22/2017 1:52:15 PM PST by TigersEye (Winning. Winning winning winning every day!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson