Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strac6

“We DO NOT want to go down the Militia road, which would allow courts to define the Organized Militia as the national Guard, etc.”

The National Guard is already defined as the Organized Militia by legislation.

With some exception, everybody else from about
18 to 45 is in the Unorganized Militia at the Federal Level.

The age limits for the Unorganized Militia at the State level may vary by State.


58 posted on 02/22/2017 12:22:01 PM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: KrisKrinkle

Actually, from a legal standpoint, always try to get away from and stay away from the entire Militia concept.

Had the second amendment simply said “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” we would never have given out opponents the ability to claim that people at home are not a “well-regulated militia”

I never want the National Guard to be considered the “organized militia” or some group of 18 to 45 year-olds a militia of any kind. If that is true, we open the avenue for a rather persuasive legal argument that anyone not a member of those two groups does not have a Constitutional right to “keep and bear arms.”

If legislation makes the NG the organized militia, then other legislation can make it NOT the militia.


83 posted on 02/22/2017 2:13:51 PM PST by Strac6 ("We sleep safe in our beds only because rough men stand ready to visit violence on the enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson