As I’ve stated upthread I have no problem with the miraculous nature of this, either, but I see no need to exaggerate the difficulties involved in order to, what, magnify the miracle? Those artifacts have been lying there over 3,000 years on the seabed, they didn’t sink and they’re not covered in sand or silt. I’ve dealt with sandy seabeds before, and am aware that artifacts become buried over hundreds of years, let alone thousands of years. That these have not suggests to me that the seabed is just not that soft or saturated. Stating this does not diminish the miracle of the Red Sea Crossing of Exodus in the least.
As I stated above- corals remain uncovered - artifacts also remain uncovered or very slightly covered even after 1000’s of years
To suggest that everything must be buried in order to be ancient simply defies the facts- Archeologists have found stone structures they felt were man made on the sea floor 1000’s of years old- not buried or slightly buried- showed video of them descending on the site for the first time- stones were clearly visible and not covered up-
You will note how soft the sea bed is around the artifacts in the video above- clearly water saturated soft- easily dug through and dispersed with just the wave of a hand- I have seen many such videos showign similar-
Noone is trying to magnify the miracle- The miracle speaks for itself-