Replies

[[I have no idea why you have such a need for the seabed to be sand,]]

I have no ‘need for it’- the videos show sand- I see no evidence of a ‘smooth hard ridge’ or evidence that the bed was close enough to the surface for nature to cause the sea to part naturally, so that the people could walk on rock across the sea floor’- as someone suggested- You insinuated the floor had to be rock because a soft floor would have buried any artifacts- As we’ve seen- that is not a fact- many soft floor artifacts are on top or near top 1000’s of years later-

The bible tells me that there were walls of water o neither side, and that people walked across on dry land - God caused the strong winds to blow ‘all that night’ possibly indicating that the land of the sea floor would need to be dried out before Israel could cross- It was no ordinary wind either- a wind strong enough to cause walls of water o neither side would have likely been impossible to walk against- Yet Israel was able to make her way across- Many have suggested that nature could have caused ‘shallow waters’ to ‘reveal a land bridge’ that they could have walked across- taking God out of the equation altogether (but they are quick to add “But God got them there in time for it to happen- so there’s your miracle” you know, so as to meld ‘science’ and miracles together so as to appease the crazy religious right)

Those who state such a thing fail to grasp that that the water was high enough on either side that when God released it it completely covered the armies- in deep water- to drown them- this wasn’t an ankle deep ‘natural land bridge’ crossing that a stiff breeze, if given just the right conditions, could part naturally- Those making the claim wish to diminish the miracles of God and assign them to natural events-

[[not evident in anything you’ve posted.]]

Really? I saw plenty of evidence that it was-