Archaeologists Discover Remains of Egyptian Army From the Biblical Exodus in Red Sea

I had a better list and explanations than the following, but the links if still valid, will detail what';s wrong with each process, and why they are inaccurate: Superposition Not a valid dating method- too manyvariables must be taken into account- too many suppositions http://www.fbinstitute.com/powell/evolutionexposed.htm Stratigraphy http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/bulletins/135/home.html Dendrochronology Up to 10000 years tops (The tree rings are not consistent, especially during drought years- which throws the readings off- Radiometric Dating Methods problems with radiometic http://www.specialtyinterests.net/carbon14.html Obsidian Hydration Dating Many obsidians are crowded with microlites and crystallines (gobulites and trichites), and these form fission-track-like etch pits following etching with hydrofluoric acid. The etch pits of the microlites and crystallines are difficult to separate from real fission tracks formed from the spontaneous decay of 238U, and accordingly, calculated ages based on counts including the microlite and crystalline etch pits are not reliable.” http://trueorigin.org/dating.asp http://www.scientifictheology.com/STH/Pent3.html Paleomagnetic/Archaeomagnetic Very little info on this method http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/tecto.htm Luminescence Dating Methods http://karst.planetresources.net/Kimberley_Culture.htm Amino Acid Racemization http://www.creation-science-prophecy.com/amino/ Fission-track Dating http://www.ao.jpn.org/kuroshio/86criticism.html Ice Cores Varves At best- the two methods above are only accurate to about 11,000 years due to numerous conditions and environmental uncertainties Pollens Corals Highly unreliable- you'd need constant temps to maintaIN reliable growth pattersn http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i1/coral_reef.asp Cation Ratio Fluorine Dating http://www.present-truth.org/Creation/creation-not-evolution-13.htm Patination Known times only throuhg analysis of the patina Oxidizable Carbon Ratio Electron Spin Resonance Cosmic-ray Exposure Dating Closely related to the buggiest dating methods of Carbon dating why it's wrong: http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/dating.html#Carbon http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3059 RaDio helio dating disproves: http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/369 http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/ http://www.rae.org/

I had a better list and explanations than the following, but the links if still valid, will detail what’;s wrong with each process, and why they are inaccurate:

Superposition
Not a valid dating method- too manyvariables must be taken into account- too many suppositions
http://www.fbinstitute.com/powell/evolutionexposed.htm

Stratigraphy
http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/bulletins/135/home.html

Dendrochronology
Up to 10000 years tops (The tree rings are not consistent, especially during drought years- which throws the readings off-

Radiometric Dating Methods
problems with radiometic http://www.specialtyinterests.net/carbon14.html

Obsidian Hydration Dating
Many obsidians are crowded with microlites and crystallines (gobulites and trichites), and these form fission-track-like etch pits following etching with hydrofluoric acid. The etch pits of the microlites and crystallines are difficult to separate from real fission tracks formed from the spontaneous decay of 238U, and accordingly, calculated ages based on counts including the microlite and crystalline etch pits are not reliable.
http://trueorigin.org/dating.asp
http://www.scientifictheology.com/STH/Pent3.html

Paleomagnetic/Archaeomagnetic
Very little info on this method
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/tecto.htm

Luminescence Dating Methods
http://karst.planetresources.net/Kimberley_Culture.htm

Amino Acid Racemization
http://www.creation-science-prophecy.com/amino/

Fission-track Dating
http://www.ao.jpn.org/kuroshio/86criticism.html

Ice Cores
Varves
At best- the two methods above are only accurate to about 11,000 years due to numerous conditions and environmental uncertainties

Pollens
Corals
Highly unreliable- you’d need constant temps to maintaIN reliable growth pattersn http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i1/coral_reef.asp

Cation Ratio
Fluorine Dating
http://www.present-truth.org/Creation/creation-not-evolution-13.htm

Patination
Known times only throuhg analysis of the patina
Oxidizable Carbon Ratio

Electron Spin Resonance
Cosmic-ray Exposure Dating
Closely related to the buggiest dating methods of Carbon dating

why it’s wrong:
http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/dating.html#Carbon
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3059

RaDio helio dating disproves:
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/369
http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/
http://www.rae.org/

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.