To: naturalman1975
I really do not get why they want to give all the advantage to the EU by invoking the wrong clause of the treaty. The right way to go is clausula rebus sic stantibus, which would put all parties on an even footing, and especially since the EU itself changed the circumstances under which the treaties were written multiple times already.
2 posted on
02/20/2017 6:50:40 PM PST by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
3 posted on
02/20/2017 6:55:35 PM PST by
publius911
(I SUPPORT MY PRESIDENT!!!)
To: Olog-hai
There’s a few reasons as I understand it, but the main one is that doing so could invoke challenges through the European courts to whether or not an EU member has a right to invoke that principle. Article 50 was introduced in the Lisbon treaty largely because of the debate over that.
The last thing Britain needs is European courts interfering on this issue - especially as the most likely court to be involved is an EU court.
4 posted on
02/20/2017 6:57:50 PM PST by
naturalman1975
("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson