THe “board” doesn’t have a brain. I like his unconventional thinking and analytical abilities, and that he’s often a contrarian when the group-think is heading off into some other direction. That’s the kind of person I would want as a key advisor.
Others trot out the tired old arguments about “neocon” and “hawk” which do neither the man or the poster any credit.
Are you okay with McMaster? I’m watching a few interviews now. Not sure yet personally but I trust our President’s judgment.