I do. Can’t you read?
I jumped into the later part of the thread and saw your post #336..
"I accept him at his word when he says THREE TIMES that sex with 13 year olds doesn’t qualify as pedophila. It does."
The "it does" could indicate that you thought it does qualify as Pedophilia.
I tried to see what earlier comments you may have made and traced a discussion back to post #85 ...
Be accurate and fair. Milo said on his Facebook page that
1) the term “boy” in homosexual jargon does not mean “underage” but is just a common term;
2) He has disavowed any and all sex with minors.
It’s important that we include all of the information on this.
Which I find an entirely sensible and helpful post.
Post 336 seemed to contradict post 85.
Two possible reasons presented themselves,
either in the course of the thread, you had for some reason changed your mind
or post 336 had an unintentional ambiguity
...should we add the possibility that I can't read to the list? ;)