Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/17/2017 12:01:31 AM PST by elhombrelibre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: elhombrelibre

You fail the E quip and out you go!


2 posted on 02/17/2017 12:04:28 AM PST by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

Whatever....


3 posted on 02/17/2017 12:06:10 AM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

This from the same bunch who cleared tax cheats, deadbeats, and towel snapping perverts. Timmy Geithner really was amazing.


4 posted on 02/17/2017 12:21:18 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

Too bad they don’t require such checks of candidates running for office?


5 posted on 02/17/2017 12:23:33 AM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

Bottom line, even if the previous administrations were given the benefit of the doubt, you can’t expect that for your choices.

It’s a raw but legit deal. They’re holding us to our standards, while we give them a pass.


6 posted on 02/17/2017 12:34:18 AM PST by Fhios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
Certain positions require a minimum of Top Secret clearance. However, I routinely saw the duties of various positions modified to allow political appointees to retain their jobs. The "Duties" were then written into their subordinates' positions and, information on those duties was not to be discussed with the uncleared bosses! (Carter and Reagan Administrations....)

At the Whitehouse I doubt this is possible!

8 posted on 02/17/2017 12:46:25 AM PST by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

Standard SF86 check. Nothing new.


13 posted on 02/17/2017 1:09:25 AM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

I am glad that finally, an administration is following standards!


20 posted on 02/17/2017 3:12:52 AM PST by Redleg Duke (He is leading us in Making America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

Makes you think how many were admitted during the a@@clowns reign


25 posted on 02/17/2017 4:12:53 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
LOL! "Marched" - they probably would have like to have said "Duck walked"....I was a security manager for a long time and knew many good people who failed to get security clearances for pretty mundane reasons - in some cases a commander could waiver the person as long as they wouldn't be in contact with classified but that was mainly used for folks who had been on board then failed a re-check due to financial woes, etc.

The implication is that these people were serious mistakes when some old minor lapse may very well be the reason.

27 posted on 02/17/2017 4:19:50 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

“marched out”

Sounds more like N.Korea.? I am sure they were escorted out of the building by security.


31 posted on 02/17/2017 5:14:07 AM PST by Leep (Cyclops Network News (CNN). The Most Trusted Source Of Fake News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
Peace, elhombrelibre,

Too bad we can't apply this same standard to members of Congress. We'd get rid of a lot of bad apples if they actually had to pass a security background check.


James R. McClure Jr.
Jeffersonian Anti-Federalist Democrat

32 posted on 02/17/2017 5:36:28 AM PST by James R. McClure Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

How many of Obama’s failed?
(or did he just grant them all waivers?)


34 posted on 02/17/2017 6:37:21 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson