Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: davikkm

Periodically, funding for former “presidents” security and pensions comes up for renewal and is routinely rubber stamped. 0bama’s should be cut with a line item veto if necessary. The criminal usurper has siphoned off more than enough cash to pay for his own security, and we certainly don’t need to be financing his TREASON and SEDITION through a pension.


6 posted on 02/16/2017 5:10:13 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Soros and 0bama are committing sedition in an attempt to nullify the election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: The Sons of Liberty

“...0bama’s should be cut with a line item veto if necessary.”

There IS NO line item veto. Reagan asked for it and did not receive it.

Compounding WAS the method a President used prior to Nixon’s impeachment to stop funds going to a particular destination (Obama’s security in this instance), but after that the Dem’s in Congress passed baseline-budgeting which removed the ‘Compounding’ clause.

Not to say I do not agree with you...


17 posted on 02/16/2017 5:30:00 AM PST by BBB333 (The power of TRUMP compels you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson