You could have made your point or points more simply, without the self-glorification (if it is true).
Your post about “Mike” reeks of confusion mongering, and if you had anything to do with American intelligence we all should be worried.
You know what? You’re absolutely right.
I’m just another know-it-all sitting around in my pajamas pontificating about subjects about which I know nothing because I have nothing else to do. Sound familiar? Simple and straightforward enough without being confusing?
Quick followup:
1. I don’t communicate using bumper-sticker logic. I was accused of “whining” and the poster claimed that I had no more insight than anyone else on FR, which is not true - at least with respect to Mike Flynn’s situation, since I know him and I’ve been there myself. Not, obviously, as National Security Advisor, but pretty damned close.
2. From your response, I can only conclude that you spend a lot of time around self-promoting liars. I am curious, however; how does one self-glorify when neither you nor hardly anyone on this site know who I am? “Look at me! Oh, never mind, you can’t see me and you don’t know who I am.”
3. Just what the hell do you know about intelligence? Do you truly believe it boils down to tweets and bumper stickers?
4. I don’t know Keith Kellogg and our paths have never crossed.
5. Yes, I am a smartass. I try to hide it, but I’m not always successful. Sufficiently succinct for you?