To: EarthResearcher333; KC Burke
Not sure what you’re referring to in this reply?
Is there anyone at DWR who attempts to tell a straight story? Are the PR folks callous, inept or both?
4,448 posted on
12/01/2017 5:53:08 PM PST by
The Westerner
(Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine and education and the forests)
To: The Westerner
The issue of an erosion resistant mix design being selected for usage caused me to speculate on the risks of special mix designs that might not have a succulent history with the exact aggregate, cement and mix equipment.
ER declined to speculate.
The 2/3 of the finished spillway being in place having cracks raises questions as to ownership management of the project that is currently at half a billion that California is planning to bleed out of the US tax payer.
4,449 posted on
12/01/2017 7:19:21 PM PST by
KC Burke
(If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
To: The Westerner
All I can say is that FERC was correct in their surprise and reasons for asking DWR for an explanation. One of the articles mentioned that DWR was planning on holding some community meetings due to the controversy or surprise of what the AP discovered in FERC to DWR communication letters (only gleaning info from the subject "cover letters" on FERC's database).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson