Replies

Wow. Remember the construction worker who lost is job from posting a damaged mess (spillway) photo to social media? Looks like he captured critical evidence that no other photographic angles or media was able to capture (likely due to the lower river view angle access the media relied on). The other media photographs inadvertently "hid" this pile of massive thick slabs that collapsed just above the original "hole" blowout failure area (angles of photos from lower spillway). The pile of these thick slabs (estimated near 6 feet thick avg)** didn't move during the earlier 33,000cfs and 45,000 cfs flows. ALL of the rest of the standard thinner spillway slabs were washed away. This is also a testament to the sheer weight of these monsters.

Only until the spillway was cranked up to 100,000 cfs did these massive slab blocks disappear. That is the time that the curious "Large Block" appeared at the end of the Main Spillway Chute - lodged against one of the flip bucket Chute Blocks.

That key picture from the worker makes him a hero for capturing critical evidence. This points to a larger problem of "void filling" on a big scale. DWR may be facing a difficult position as they are expecting 75% of the repair funding from FEMA. But, under FEMA's rules, this funding can only be from designated "disasters". If determined that the spillway crisis was from "negligent maintenance and/or repair activity (incompetent)", then CA & DWR risk losing the FEMA funding.

**distance to blocks from camera shot plus the relevant size of the reference dimensions of the upper main spillway seams.

Evidence of 9+ foot thick Large Block of concrete at the bottom of Main Spillway? Large Void Chasms under Spillway? DSOD Inspectors told not to fix until damaged?

Fig 8. from article - original pic taken by worker & posted on social media - was fired over this. Yet provides the only huge critical evidence no other pictures captured.

Fig 2. from article

Fig 3. from article

Fig 4. from article