Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalHope; KC Burke
EH: "Apparently there is an alternative explanation that involves water seepage taking out some of the material, but leaving other (generally larger) material behind."

Correct

EH: "If water HAD shown as a surface flow it would have been cause for an immediate loud alarm, and it certainly would have been documented. There is no record of that ever happening."

Correct

EH: "A side issue I have not seen addressed is the SIZE of these channels."

Channel widths: avg: 6.69ft, 5.72ft, merged: 10.68ft, 20.55ft, (they get wider as they combine/merge as in the two larger numbers).

EH: "Another side issue I have not seen mentioned is the number of these channels, and the fact that they seem somewhat evenly spaced and approximately the same size. This is not what I would expect from a single point source."

Correct

KCB: "The lower strata, when saturated, would sometimes be also exposed to rain. The rain would repeatedly carry off the “fines”, such a fine sands and smaller grained non-organics. As it did so, the larger gravels were striated into rivulets due to the action of the small grains being carried by water pushing the larger cobbles into stripes."

Precisely Correct

3,602 posted on 05/09/2017 10:09:59 AM PDT by EarthResearcher333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3595 | View Replies ]


To: EarthResearcher333

Thanks.


3,604 posted on 05/09/2017 10:11:21 AM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3602 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson