[Principled]

What exactly is it about the EO that can be fixed so the new EO would be bulletproof?

I read that a lot. What precisely is wrong with the first EO that can be “fixed”?

[BlackbirdSST]

First, there is nothing wrong with the original EO. It was based on a previous EO submitted by the boi who would be King. No one objected. It was 'bullet proof'. If there was an error made, it was acknowledging the subservient court had jurisdiction. Bad move. He should never have allowed anyone from Justice to even appear at the mock hearing. This young (in tenure)President will make an occasional misstep.

I say pull it, just to remove any further review by this subordinate court. Issue another EO with some esoteric change, come to US and say point blank, the lower Federal Courts have no say. They are not privy to the Security Information flow that changes by the minute so they cannot possibly have the right to review. They will not be granted the right to review ANY National Security process or info while I am President. My EO stands as written and I include clear language that those I supervise and issue directives will now be allowed and expected to perform their duties to the full extent of existing Law in an effort to keep America and it's Citizens safe! In a couple of days he's going to send them off chasing their tails on some other cock&bull ride, this will be old news. I expect he will be doing something along these lines tomorrow or Tuesday.