Posted on 02/10/2017 8:10:27 AM PST by LS
No. Not worth it.
I don’t believe for a minute that Warren could have beaten Trump. I don’t even think she would have beaten Cruz or Rubes.
Cankles had that Clinton loyalty that has built up for 20 years. Warren would have been viewed as the leftist that she (and Cankles) really was.
I think their problem is that they all suffer from delusions of Grandeur .... Idiots!
They will never learn because the operate from the delusion that they are always right and everyone else is wrong. Their brains have truly fallen out, I knew Trump was going to win because he was speaking with and listening to the real majority of Americans who were disgusted with Obama’s America (and Clintons). The people they chose to ignore did them in and it will continue to be so because they are so narrow-minded by due to their Blind belief that “Socialism” is the answer.
I remember Pelosi coming on very early and acting like Hillary winning was a done deal and basically saying "Well, we have to go through the formality of counting the votes first".
I've reviewed virtually all the coverage from election night, and the extreme bias is plain for all to see.
Fox was probably the least biased, but that's not saying much, of course...
By the way, for sheer apocalyptic hysteria, nobody could ever outdo Richard Engel, chief foreign correspondent of NBC news. His raw malice and unhinged fear-mongering on election night were just breathtaking. The guy is a total piece of liberal sh!t.
I’ve watched most of the coverage and you’re right; only Fox makes a try at being neutral. Katie Couric is on the Yahoo! News extended coverage with a group of left wing nuts. “Sargent” Shultz headlines Bloomberg’s eight hours and there is this bizarre extended coverage of Never Trump conservatives led by Glenn Beck sitting around in a mockup of the Oval Office and saying inane things far beyond their bed times. Actually, BBC has some of the best coverage, even though it is tilted, the lead commentator, one Andrew Neil, tries to be mostly objective although he is surrounded by some bawling left wing loons. Some of the worst commentary comes from the “Republicans” the networks have as pundits: Steve Schmitt from McCain’s staff, Stuart Stevens (who ran Romney’s campaign), and a few outliers who are nasty but whom I was never acquainted. CNN at least had Jeffrey Lord on. It was also fun to watch the dour George Will sitting there stone faced and stone mouthed on Fox. All on Youtube.
That line reminded me of this Ogden Nash bit:
The camel has a single hump;
The dromedary, two;
Or else the other way around.
I'm never sure. Are you?
Was guessing that. :/
Katie Couric stooped to having some kids on who were coloring the national map red or blue. Her staffer interviewed two young girls who said Trump was “mean”. There is no balance, whatever - the only Republicans are grumblers from the Bush Administration or neverTrumpers. Frank Luntz is on during the 7:00 hour saying how Trump went wrong with his emphasis on immigration which is why Hillary will be doing so much better and he will lose. Ha!
Richard, you just described my public school education in a liberal city. I didn’t know another point of view existed, not really. Because their method incapcitates a young mind.
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”. or
Laissez-Faire Capitalism and Individual Rights. One or the other. There’s no in between.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.