Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mandaladon

Well of course the court didn’t mention the part of the statutes that grant sweeping power to the president. If they did they would have to rule against the Seattle judge.

I agree with you and Judge Napolitano that going straight to the Supremes is the best course. The 9th’s ruling is so unconstitutional Trump should be able to get a 5-3 ruling to uphold the ban.


19 posted on 02/10/2017 7:34:45 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Georgia Girl 2

There is risk, what if it isn’t 5-3? What amendment would they succeed in adding the the constitution if Trump loses in the SCOTUS?


71 posted on 02/10/2017 8:49:22 AM PST by bigtoona (Make America Great Again! America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson