If science holds to strict naturalism, then a hypothesis like the Big Bang that requires intervention from outside the universe has basically falsified itself.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So you hold to the Steady State model and that the Big Bang is unscientific?
That means that the Creation Ministries International article has a good point. Why are scientists pursuing any work that is not based on science?
By the way, if you have any evidence besides simple assertion that the Big Bang theory and cosmic inflation are invalid (what did you call it? “fudging the numbers”?), you can get a Nobel Prize in Physics. Just write it up and send it in. Like all math classes, though, they’ll ask you to show your work. Hope you did it.
“So you hold to the Steady State model and that the Big Bang is unscientific?”
No, I choose the third option: if you can’t determine it using proper science, it’s better just to say “I don’t know” than to bend the rules just to try to come up with an answer.