No, actually it's about what are your preconceived notions and the reliance you place on what is likely bad data that you use to support them.
As Kellyann Conway might ask, what were the internals of that Gallup poll? Who was sampled? How were the questions framed? How does you data support the position you are trying to argue with me?
You may recall that Gallup gave up trying to do polling in the 2016 election, because their land-line based methods in the 2012 election are so poor, antiquated, and non-predictive. What confidence do you have that their data in the poll you reference isn't derived from the same Democrat- oversampled, daytime television-watching, stay-at-home welfare queens that they used to make failed election predictions?
I answered your sad little "prove it" challenge with Invanka Trump as an example. Having mentioned Kellyann Conway just now, you do realize that she is, like my own wife, a mother to 4 children, who is not that "stay-at-home-mom" who while she is advising the most powerful man in the world is not attending to the minute-to-minute needs of her children.
Will you also now continue to stand there in your self-important, self-righteous judgment of Kellyann Conway too?
It's a sad, bitter little corner of the world you choose to occupy.
The data you use to support your theories and opinions might not be that reliable either.
FReegards!
