By definition, an “Executive Order” both makes and carries out law. Otherwise, it is not an “executive order”. Normally “executive orders” are directives to unelected and unaccountable administrative agencies which themselves are generally unconstitutional.
I'd sure like to see where that definition came from. Did you make it up yourself?
“both makes and carries out law.”
Got a legal citation for that claim?
An executive order is nothing more than the president exercising his authority. It doe snot “make law”, it carries out law.
Seriously, get an education.