Dodd-Barney Frank must be tossed, it’s a terrible rule.
With a name like “Dodd Frank” how could it be otherwise?
Please forgive my ignorance (finance is not my forte) but why it is NOT a good thing for a retirement financial advisor to be a fiduciary and work in the best interest of the client? I work in the medical field and to me it’s analogous to a physician working in the best interest of the patient. Can someone please explain? Thanks, L.
Next should be a “review” of Sarbanes-Oxley, and Davis-Bacon...they need to be tossed as well.