Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

Very interesting. “They”, the liberal socialists cannot ever create a leftist tea party. The tea parties were completely organic. Rick Santelli’s Tea Party rant in 2009 sparked the movement into being. The movement was already on high alert awaiting a call to actionn. That was it and it exploded.

The difference and the problem that the left has is that it is inherently a “victim” mindset requiring constant coersion and external funding to exist. The tea parties are mostly self funded. We are not only never paid by any political action committees or groups, we donate to them.

When we do march or rally, we pay our own way. We don’t just have skin in the game, we are the players, we are the game. And, there’s one other possibility that must be contended with, people who prefer liberty over security are inherently more capable, more fearless and more honorable than those who seek security over liberty.


13 posted on 01/29/2017 9:58:12 AM PST by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gspurlock

>Very interesting. “They”, the liberal socialists cannot ever create a leftist tea party. The tea parties were completely organic. Rick Santelli’s Tea Party rant in 2009 sparked the movement into being. The movement was already on high alert awaiting a call to actionn. That was it and it exploded.

The dirty little secret is the left has never been able to create a non AstroTurfed movement. Even the anti-war movement of the 60s was entirely funded from Moscow.


17 posted on 01/29/2017 10:02:45 AM PST by RedWulf (TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson