Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lodi90
I do not recall the exact details either, but you are to a large extent correct.

The Mexican fruit was not allowed in until relatively recently -- except for certain times of year. That prohibition protected American growers.

We can thank the Chilean imports for breaking that set-up. Or curse them under one's breath sort'a like the Morro growers would.

The deal there is that the Morro fruit would come in late, and so pretty consistently would fetch a good price.

The changes made harvest strategizing difficult. I do not pretend to know the answers. (not enough information on when other harvests are most likely to come in, critical price points, etc.)

101 posted on 01/28/2017 9:38:24 PM PST by BlueDragon (on a 10 dollar horse and a 40 dollar saddle I'm goin' up the trail with them longhorn cattle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: BlueDragon

Your reference to Chilean ag goods reminds me that the money doesn’t all stay in Chile. A few years back, I was living there. A product for grapes and orchard use showed up, and. I was asked to give a bunch of talks at grower meetings. I noticed that certain names I recognized from earlier work in CA kept popping up. Long story shot, US growers from the Bakersfield area had bought 49% shares in many farms, brought in US technology, and were returning on capital 12 months a year. (Chile 6 month s out of phase, for those in Rio Linda)


136 posted on 01/28/2017 11:16:59 PM PST by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson