[Steve_Seattle]

"Contrary to the claims of certain major media outlets and fact checkers, a comprehensive analysis of this issue shows that substantial numbers of non-citizens vote illegally in U.S. elections. However, contrary to Trump, the data does not prove that he would have won the popular vote if this fraud did not take place. Instead, it only shows that this is a reasonable possibility."

Anyone who claims that hardly any illegals vote is a liar.

[spintreebob]

All sides of this debate are extremely sloppy with their facts, logic and especially their language.

A quote refers to non-citizens.
Then a jump is made to illegals.

There are far more legal non-ctizens in the US than illegals. In my experience, far more legal non-citizens are registered to vote than illegals.

In other comments, language confusion exists over jumping from illegal voting to illegal immigrants as if they are the same. They are not the same. Far more illegal voting involves the dead, and especially citizens who moved and are still registered at their old address than involves non-citizens, let alone illegal non-citizens.

The article for this thread states: social security card/number is a common a requirement to register to vote. I checked all the big states that have most of the immigrants. In none of them is a social security card/number a requirement to register, or to vote. I have followed this professionally and I am not aware of any small state that requires it, although I did not check every single one of them specifically for this.

Can anyone name a single state where a social security card/number is a requirement to register? or to vote?

Many more examples could be given of fake facts, bad logic and especially confusion of language.